Beau E. Cox wrote: > On Wednesday 31 March 2004 02:49 pm, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>>anway, I'm trying my best to track it down, as is philippe, but more eyes >>>are always welcome. if you're looking for a place to start, I'd check >>>out all the APR commits over the past two weeks - that is first on my >>>list once I get a free moment. >> >>for those following along, it definitely seems to be something within httpd >>in the past month. httpd/apr/apr-util HEAD checkouts with -D"2004-03-01" >>test just fine against current mod_perl 2.0 cvs on fedora. >> > > > Geoff - > > Just wondering, is the older ( -D"2004-03-01" ) Apache2.1 still > available via CVS ( without you doing a lot of work )? > > If I could test against it, it would narrow my problem down.
last night I ran snapshots from every day in march - 3/26 was the last working day for me, the APR LFS stuff was committed on the 27th. I also checked out httpd HEAD with APR from 3/26 and it worked fine, so it's definitely an APR issue. the easiest way I know of to get old snapshots is: cvs -z9 -d":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic" checkout -d httpd-2.1 -D"2004-03-26" httpd-2.0 cd httpd-2.1/srclib cvs -z9 -d":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic" checkout -D"2004-03-26" apr cvs -z9 -d":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic" checkout -D"2004-03-26" apr-util HTH --Geoff -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
