On 08 Apr 2004 11:35:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
> >>>>> "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stas> While mod_perl2 is almost there it is still in beta and some of > the Stas> API is still changing. So if you want to stick with a stable > API use Stas> mod_perl1 for now. > > Yeah, I was wondering about that. > > In particular, I've been drafted to give a "mod perl" talk on the > Apache track at OSCON. My notes are all mod-perl1. Will I be boo'ed > off the stage if I mention mod_perl2 only in passing? I think as long as you specify up front that it's mostly about mp1 I don't think anyone would boo you. :) However, you might not get as big of a turn out from those of us who have switched or are in the process of switching to 2.0. Considering most (if not all) of the talks last year at OSCON were about 2.0 or switching to 2.0, a mostly 1.0 talk might be welcomed by people who are new to mod_perl or not looking to switch in the near future. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://frank.wiles.org --------------------------------- -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html