Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

k714% ./nonblock
found port: 52984
O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.

This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across accept() on NetBSD, which contradicts the behaviour you are seeing.


same on netbsd-1.6.1

k133% ./nonblock
found port: 65534
O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
k133%


Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD
fcntl() is being economical with the truth.  It doesn't return
O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is non-blocking. I'll put in the
suggested apr_hints.m4 change.  fun fun

Excellent. Thanks Joe!

So what Apache version will this fix feature in, so we can properly skip it in the tests?

--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html



Reply via email to