On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
k714% ./nonblock found port: 52984 O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across accept() on NetBSD, which contradicts the behaviour you are seeing.
same on netbsd-1.6.1
k133% ./nonblock found port: 65534 O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child. k133%
Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD fcntl() is being economical with the truth. It doesn't return O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is non-blocking. I'll put in the suggested apr_hints.m4 change. fun fun
Excellent. Thanks Joe!
So what Apache version will this fix feature in, so we can properly skip it in the tests?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
