So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
my $should_skip = ($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) || ($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
and the tests that need to be skipped are:
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_block.t t/protocol/echo_filter.t t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
Yes, these tests break unless you have the APR patch. I don't know of any others that also break.
You mean they still break OpenBSD with 2.0.51? I thought you said the patch was applied and entered 2.0.51. I'm at loss here. Should this just be:
my $should_skip = $^0 eq /^(Open|Net)BSD$/i;
for now?
p.s. 2.0.51 was just released, not sure if you had a chance to test it.
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
