On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:52:06PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > Thanks, William. I've committed an extended version of your patch but at > the beginning of that section. Please let me know if it needs more work.
Looks good. That explains it the way I now understand it to work. > I believe the error message should have explained that in first place. If > it's not clear enough (which is most likely the case, if you did read it), > you know what to do :) Yes, I see it now. It had scrolled past so fast that by the time I was prompted to run the tests, I had forgotten about the messages. Mea culpa. William -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com