Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:36 -0500 > Tony Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Quoting Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:33 -0400 > > > "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Part of it may also be that I still see people and posts > surprised > > > > that "mod_perl 2 is finished?". > > > > > > That could be as well. We should really get our 2.0 press > release > > > out. > > > > RHEL/Centos 4 are still sitting on 1.99_16, which probably isn't > > helping matters. > > > > Definitely not. Perhaps we should put together some "official" > replacement RPMs for RHEL/Centos to ease everyone's upgrade path.
I've raised a bug on the Centos site for upgrading to mod_perl 2.0.1: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1001 It is currently assigned to the maintainer of the mod_perl rpm, so we'll see where that goes - I'll keep an eye on it. Centos packages mod_perl, but no extra Apache:: modules. There are some Apache:: modules available from popular downstream rpm repositories such as dag/dries which will also need updating. I'll chase this down with those sites, too. regards, Tony
