Geoff, On Tuesday 10 January 2006 19:21, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Nevertheless, I really think it is a bug, since it provokes action at a > > distance. > > I think it's best filed under "feature" - the mp1 behavior is not going > to change and has been more than ok for years and years now, and it's > priobably better to have mp1 and mp2 be in sync here in the > principle-of-least-surprise-while-migrating kind of way than to go > messing around with the API now.
I understand your compatibility concerns and agree with them. But I also try to understand why it is a feature and cannot see the point. I'm asking because your Apache2::Connection::pnotes patch also implements this feature. Torsten
pgpEAOgjnjaUS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
