Forgot to add:
I'm big on templating...
If you're looking at multiple frameworks, remember to keep templating
in mind
Making /designing the damn things can take more time than coding your
logic. and switching them from one system to another can be a
nightmare.
Some systems are very interchangeable (like there are TAL
implementations for most languages) , others are not.
Template::Toolkit and HTML::Template are supported by most perl
frameworks , but I think Mason integration is limited.
Text::Template shouldn't be hard to extend into anything you want.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Dan Axtell wrote:
I've been meaning to look at Catalyst, but I'm pretty happy with the
CGI::Builder framework, which is very flexible, is pretty well
integrated
with other CPAN tools such as session management and templates
modules, and
more or less follows the Apache request cycle. It started out as
an improved
CGI::Application clone but is much better and more flexible.
