On 2/17/06, Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:31:21 -0500 (EST)
Jeff Pang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do agree mod_perl is a strong web-develop language.But I still
> think it consume too much memory. Under my test,it's not so stable as
> fast-cgi,and eat much more memory than fast-cgi.Maybe the truth is
> not so,it's just my test result. I know the famous email site
> www.postmaster.co.uk is running under mod_perl,it act
> excellently.while the another strong email provider www.gmx.net is
> running under fast-cgi.
There are lots of different ways to get around the memory
consumption. Using the light/heavy approach I was able to handle
20,000 unique visitors and roughly 100k page views per day with
just 3 12 MB mod_perl processess.
Not sure what you mean about stability, I've been
running mod_perl for years and have not had a stability issue.
There are tons of other large sites out there running mod_perl like
Ticketmaster.com and slashdot.org for example.
---------------------------------
Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.wiles.org
---------------------------------
--
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131
