Harry Zhu wrote: > I'm very much interested. > > Harry. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Enno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Frank Wiles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Leo Lapworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <modperl@perl.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:46 AM > Subject: Re: [OT] modperl vs. Ruby > > >> Just starting to look at Catalyst, cause we have to rewrite a lot of >> stuff here. So far I'm just installing and the incredible amount of >> dependencies there are, are scaring the hell out of me (think huge >> processes). >> >> It looks like its including an immense load of pure perl modules for >> functionality thats already present in mp2+apreq2. (but I might be wrong) >> >> So what I'm gonna do now is benchmark a simple catalyst app versus a pure >> mp2+apreq2 handler. >> >> Will post results back to the list, if anyone is interested. >> >> Enno
I'm jumping in late here, but I felt the need to since you mentioned the number of dependencies for a Catalyst install. For those who want to try it without installing everything under the sun, give CatInABox a try. http://handelframework.com/downloads/CatInABox.tar.gz All you have to do is unpack it, run the start.sh script to setup PATH/PERL5LIB, and you're ready to give Catalyst a try in standalone mode using it's own dev server. That package also includes the Catalyst::Engine::Apache* stuffs as well for loading Cat apps under MP/MP2. -=Chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
