Joachim Zobel wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:17:47 +0200 > Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>The better approach seems to me using mod_dbd which has the draw back >>that it is only available on apache-2.2 at least for mysql it looks >>like it's not rocket science to get it working. > > > AFAIK this has not yet been DBIfied and the interface is not yet as > rich as the one provided by DBI. > > One severe limitation is at the moment that you can have only one pool > per apache. So having 3 db handles is not an option, at least if they > access the db as different users. > > Of course a db interface provided by apache is a very promising > approach. > > Sincerely, > Joachim > >
Hi, I don't think you need to DBIfy this. In my thinking you only use the framework to pool the connection. The connection pointer fetched is fed into DBD::MySQL, all this is happing on the C-level and you don't even know that mod_dbd/apr_dbd have been involved. In my thinking you only have to teach DBD::* to use mod_dbd/apr_dbd to fetch the database connection instead of opening one itself. Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
