On Tue, 9 May 2006 13:45:57 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taking this another step further, I don't get the impression that > perlbal or pound will achieve the "temporary" caching on the > middle-proxy server allowing the back-end server to get back to other > requests. > > Anyone know for sure? I know perlbal does "cache" the result from the backend server and spoon feeds it out to the client. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiles.org ---------------------------------
