Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
manually build it
does anyone know who is handling the redhat distribution of this?
aside from it being 2years old and off the old API / namespace, isn't it
also essentially beta and unstable? whereas the 2.06+ are fairly stable
and production ready.
You meant to say 2.00+
2.06 is libapreq. and 2.07 is the first non dev release there.
No, I do not know who is doing this.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
"It takes a minute to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone,
and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone..."
