On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:09:26 -0400 Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 12:45 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Attached is our function that we use both under mod_perl and > > standard perl. > > No offense, but you'd be much better off using one of the standard > parsers, like CGI.pm or libapreq. These get a lot of peer review and > the bugs have been pretty well shaken out over the years. If you > think it's easy to get these things right, take a look at the CGI.pm > changelog. Another thing people don't always think about is the future coder that is going to have to learn your library, rather than hit the ground running with a standard solution. This is partly why frameworks are appealing to management types, you can find people who are already half trained in your code base. Which is in part why we open sourced our Gantry framework. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiles.org ---------------------------------
