On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Grant wrote:
> > > > > Also, I tried restarting the interchange daemon with
> > > > > PERL_SIGNALS=unsafe and the ALERT/segfaults came MUCH MUCH more
> > > > > frequently. Does that tell us anything?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It would make sense that, when you have high load, there is a
> > > > problem
> > > > processing many concurrent requests which triggers the PIPE
> > > > signal, so
> > > > you should find out what the error is, and handle it more
> > > > gracefully.
> > > >
> > > > You might want to change the die sub to print out $! and $? -
> > > > that may
> > > > give you a bit of a clue as to what caused the PIPE signal.
> > > >
> > > > I'm guessing (and it is a guess) that the segfaults may be caused
> > > > because the die sub sends a web response, but that sub could be
> > > > called
> > > > while your server is busy doing something else, and the two
> > > > actions
> > > > collide.
> > >
> > > Very good guess. Commenting out the web response stuff seems to
> > > have
> > > eliminated the segfaults. Adding $! and $? to the warn line, I'm
> > > getting one of these two bits along with each ALERT now:
> > >
> > > Broken pipe 0
> > > Inappropriate ioctl for device 0
> > This could happen from a Cntrl-C or stop in a browser.
> >
> > Add
> > require Carp;
> > Carp::cluck() to your die() function.
>
> Is this someplace that checking $r->connection->aborted() would be
> useful?
Would I just add "$r->connection->aborted()" without the quotes to the
warn line?
If I do change the warn line to:
warn "ALERT: bad pipe signal received for $ENV{SCRIPT_NAME} $! $?
$r->connection->aborted()\n";
try
warn "ALERT: bad pipe signal received for $ENV{SCRIPT_NAME} $! $? "
. $r->connection->aborted . "\n";
I get:
ALERT: bad pipe signal received for / Broken pipe 0
Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x16eef638)->connection->aborted()
Any help with that or Carp::cluck implementation would be greatly
appreciated.
- Grant