On 6/5/07, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From the docs: "CGI::Ex::Template is fast but CGI::Ex::Template::XS is even faster. If CGI::Ex::Template isn't fast enough for you, the XS version has key methods coded in C and provides a noticable improvement over the non-XS version. CET by itself is generally faster than TT, HT, and HTE. The XS version is nearly always faster - even than HTJ. CET also uses less memory than TT and HTE, and only a little more than HT.
I think that's a pretty questionable claim. TT is faster than CGI::Ex::Template in normal use with mod_perl. CET is only faster if you use mod_cgi where TT can't do caching. HTML::Template::JIT compiles your entire template into a C program, so it's hard to believe that anything else is going to be significantly faster than that. At any rate, all of the templating tools discussed so far are more than fast enough to build a large scale site with. - Perrin
