Mark Blackman wrote:
> The problem: PerlChildInitHandler handler appears to runs in the parent
> instead of the child.
> 
> After duplicating the code in
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/server.html
> for MyApache2::Startuplog.pm in the following environment.
> 
> Apache/2.2.4 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7i mod_perl/2.0.3 Perl/v5.8.8
> 
> The output from the ChildInitHandler suggests that it's being run in the
> parent, ie.
> 
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:24 2007] - open_logs  : process 8054 is born to reproduce
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:24 2007] - post_config: configuration is completed
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:24 2007] - END        : process 8054 is shutdown
> --------------------
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - open_logs  : process 8057 is born to reproduce
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - post_config: configuration is completed
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - child_init : process 8057 is born to serve
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - child_init : process 8057 is born to serve
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - child_init : process 8057 is born to serve
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - child_init : process 8057 is born to serve
> [Tue Jun 26 11:21:34 2007] - child_init : process 8057 is born to serve
> 
> I note that this issue appears to have been noted at least once before.
> 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/perl-dev/200206.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> and fixed of course.
> 
> This looks like a bug to me, but I thought I would confirm with this
> list before reporting
> as such.

I suspect that doug's original fix probably wasn't undone, but that
instead you're running into some iteration of this problem with how perl
itself represents the pid:

  http://marc.info/?t=106632745100005&r=1&w=2

so, if you have the ability, you might want to try the same experiment
with a non-threaded perl and prefork mpm and see if you have the same issue.

other than that I really don't know - there were a few different pid
issues floating around, iirc, all having to do with how $$ behaves (as
opposed to what is really going on)

sorry I'm not of more help.

--Geoff

Reply via email to