Michael Lackhoff wrote: > On 18.09.2007 15:47 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Hmm, I don't understand this, so I cannot say how serious it could be. > My question is: Should I stick with 2.0.59 or upgrade with a patched > 2.0.61/2.2.6? > This is a production server and the change log lists quite a few > security fixes for the new versions. > As long as all that could be broken is logging, I think I would like to > upgrade or could the change effect other parts as well (security)?
Read the security fixes. Primarily, unix-environmental changes. Nothing high severity if you trust the authors of web content dispatched by your server.
