On 10/17/07, Mark Maunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assuming threaded and prefork work equally well in my config, doesn't > it therefore make sense to run a threaded MPM with a small interpreter > pool instead of running prefork with a reverse proxy?
Well, you're going to use more memory with threads, but if you don't mind that then there's no reason I know of to avoid it. I should also add that since I don't run threads my information on how the worker MPM works is all second hand. The memory thing is pretty well established though. - Perrin
