Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo wrote:
maybe is important to say how compile apache and modperl ....
(it was very difficult):
Can you try compiling mod_perl as a shared object? Static module
support for mp2 is not as well supported.
perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/path/to/httpd/apxs
I will try it .....
mmm.... maybe it is another thread... but I prefer static modper for
the next arguments:
1. I guess the static modperl is faster than dynamic .... I know that
dynamic is more maintainable that static; for my aplication i
require modperl more soon;
Maybe it is faster, maybe it isn't. Either way, it is very unlikely
that you would run up against this difference as a bottleneck in your
application.
2. When modperl is dynamic i had some segment fault when i share objects
at the start of apache; when is static i don't have problem ... (maybe
i some errors in my code)
That could be - if you could post those faults and also your startup.pl
program we may be able to help.
there are things that worry me:
1. In my linux distribution (gentoo) there are not any package with
static modperl
>
2. I see that most of the community uses modperl as dynamic ... maybe
is it a sign of die the static modperl?
Building mod_perl as a static module was the defacto standard with
mod_perl1, just as building as a dynamic module is defacto with
mod_perl2. I would not try to get caught up in the differences though
and suggest that you try to get a working build as a dynamically loaded
module. If you encounter problems there, they will definitely be of
interest to the rest of us who build mod_perl as a shared object.
what is the opinion of community ?
greetings
