Perrin Harkins wrote: > different FastCGI backend because it would waste memory, so either way > you'll want to group things together as much as possible.
Yeah, that confirms my thinking. > I've heard people say that DBIx::Class has a slow startup, > so if you use that you might look there first. We do, I'll look. > You mean go directly to mod_perl? You'd still want a front-end proxy > for buffering. I'd suggest checking with the mod_proxy_balancer > people to see if they have a solution. I mean balancers -> front-end -> balancers -> back-end. Using different IPs on the balancers for front/back. It was supposed to work that way originally, but we never got round to implementing it once we discovered mod_proxy_balancer in Apache 2.2. Thanks Carl
