Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 à 14:11 -0700, Joe Schaefer a écrit : > > To me writing to a generic webserver API is not all that exciting. > Python people love it, but they've never had a proper exposure > to httpd in the first place. Yes it means you gain some portability, > but the downside is that you lose an awful lot of power that comes > from the existing open source module ecosystem for httpd. That's not > easily replaced, no matter what others may say. >
Power indeed. I wrote an application for case management that uses mod_perl's and postgresql's specific features, via simple mod_perl handlers (LAMP to me means Linux/Apache/Mod_Perl/Postgres). The result is 15 milliseconds response times to generate an html page with authentication and a hit to the database, on commodity hardware. My application serves five to six users all day with a 1.6 Ghz processor (200 dollar machine, 0 license) which peaks at 0.3% usage on busy weekdays. That leaves me room for growth. I don't suppose you can get the same numbers using frameworks? -- Vincent Veyron http://marica.fr/ Logiciel de gestion des sinistres et des contentieux pour le service juridique
