* Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote: >... > Overall, I think the concept that things should be forked to a new > 2.4 mod_perl is best because if it's backwards compatibility that's > holding things back, I'd rather lose that. I'm currently building > on a devel box running on CentOS 6.2.
There was a similar discussion when apach2 came along, and the outcome was that Stas started another version of mod_perl for it. There are enough backward compatibility issues for us to start a new apache24 mod_perl. -Jie
