I don't remember it being very difficult to build Perl with VC. I've attached the essentials. (Though I don't know whether/how the list handles attachments...)
Richard Kandarian http://www.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/fonelink.pl/085598 My node in the Web: http://www.kandarian.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Mathieu Simon [mailto:mathieu....@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 10:57 PM > To: modperl@perl.apache.org > Subject: Re: Building 2.0.9-dev on Windows w. httpd 2.4 > > (and now forwarded to the list) > > Hi > > Am 06.10.2014 um 18:54 schrieb Steve Hay: > > You need to build perl yourself using VC/nmake too or else find some > > other binary build using VC/nmake because ActivePerl actually uses > > gcc/dmake just like Strawberry Perl these days... > *Ouch*, I didn't realize. Building Perl from scratch ... well, an option. > > I guess I now understand why XAMPP doesn't deliver mod_perl anymore > with > httpd 2.4-based builds on current releases while most Linux distros with > httpd > 2.4 deliver a 2.0.9-dev build. > > XAMPP comes with Strawberry (GCC/dmake) and httpd (VC11/nmake) > which ends > up in catch-22 with mod_perl as it satisfies neither one nor the other > side of the requirements. > > Depending on how difficult it gets building Perl itself with nmake I'll > have to step back and re-think plans. > > Thanks - also Richard for the clarification on your not-a-download link :-) > > -- Mat > >
install.pod.orig
Description: install.pod.orig
notes
Description: notes
Makefile.RMK
Description: Makefile.RMK
