> I will make new binaries for 2.0.9 soon, but want to get mod_perl > working with Perl 5.22.x first.
That is great I will be looking forward to it. Will that be for Apache 2.4 or 2.2, or both ? 2.09 with Strawberry Perl 5.22 and Apache 2.4. It sound like a winner! Thanks, Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Steve Hay <steve.m....@googlemail.com> To: Thomas den Braber <tho...@delos.nl> Cc: "A. Warnier" <a...@ice-sa.com>, "modperl@perl.apache.org" <modperl@perl.apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:09:44 +0000 Subject: Re: Compiling 2.0.9 with Strawberry Perl 5.20 on windows (64Bit) On 28 September 2015 at 09:44, Thomas den Braber <tho...@delos.nl [mailto:thomas%40delos.nl]> wrote: > > >> Not directly an answer, but you may want to have a look here : >> http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/ [http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/] > > I am already using those, working very well but wanted to test the 2.0.9 and > better with Apache 2.4. > I also would like to be able to compile it my self. > > @Steve Hay: Can you explain how you setup your build environment ? > Unfortunately, mod_perl doesn't currently support dmake builds, so doesn't build directly with either ActivePerl or StrawberryPerl. I hope to add dmake support in the nearish future, but in the meantime one has to build with Visual C++/nmake (preferably (or maybe *necessarily*? I'm not sure) with an old VC that links against the old unversioned msvcrt.dll for compatibility with gcc binaries). I will make new binaries for 2.0.9 soon, but want to get mod_perl working with Perl 5.22.x first.
