On 02.08.2017 11:49, 风河 wrote:
We actually use both dancer and modperl. but dancer works separately, it
doesn't require modperl installed.
So I was asking if there is a framework for modperl which behaves as
something like dancer.
This is a bit vague as a question, for anyone to provide an answer.
What actual problem are you trying to solve ?
or : What is the problem with your current solution / (separate) tools, which makes you
try to find another one ?
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 05:42 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
On 02.08.2017 11:19, 风河 wrote:
Hi
currently we were developing the methods mostly as handlers.
is there a new popular framework for full stack development of modperl?
Yes, many. See here :
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=perl+web+development+frameworks
We (still) use Template::Toolkit, which many people would consider a bit
old and not
really "in fashion". But it works, and is simple to learn and use.
Other frameworks can be said to be more modern, more elegant, more
fashionable, etc..
But in my opinion, the more elegant and abstract a framework is, the
longer it takes to
really dominate it, the more difficult it is to figure out what really
happens when you
have a problem, and the less you are really "in control".
So the choice is yours, depending on
- where you are coming from
- where you want to go
- what kind of problems you have to solve
- how deep you still need to go into controlling what Apache does
- etc..
There is no "one size fits all", and it is very easy to get into endless
on-line
discussions about which is "the best".
(Including with people who say that they are looking for "a framework",
but really mean "a
CMS system").
