On 19 January 2017 at 14:25, Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net> wrote: > That release was canceled due to lack of votes, but regardless there was > very little effective difference between that and 2.13 - mostly around > tests, docs and build scripts. 2.13 should run just fine on 2.4
Somehow, it only came to my attention yesterday that 2.14 never officially got released. That's a great shame because 2.13 doesn't build out-of-the-box on Windows, at least not with httpd-2.4, whereas 2.14 does. Is there any chance of resurrecting it, or else just going for a new release numbered 2.15? > > Issac > > On 1/19/2017 6:30 AM, Jie Gao wrote: >> >> There was a new release candidate over a month ago, and it is available at >> https://home.apache.org/~issac/libapreq2-2.14.tar.gz . >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Jie >> >> >> >> * JW <gav...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 20:06:41 +0000 >>> From: JW <gav...@yahoo.com> >>> To: "modperl@perl.apache.org" <modperl@perl.apache.org> >>> Subject: Question about Apache 2.4 and libapreq2 (Apache2::Request) >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I currently use Apache 2.2, mod_perl and libapreq2 (for Apache2::Request >>> and Apache2::Cookie). I did a test installation of Apache 2.4 (yum), >>> mod_perl (source) and libapreq2-2.13 (source). and it seems to work fine. >>> >>> The last update of libapreq2 was in 2010. I'm aware that not every >>> library has to be updated and frankly I'm pleased that it still works. >>> However, before I make a permanent switch to Apache 2.4, I was wondering if >>> anyone doing a similar upgrade experienced problems using libapreq2 and what >>> alternative(s) they chose. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >> >
