People use nginx - probably because they haven't come across mpm_event. The two 
are I think comparable speed wise, but out of the box mpm_event is more 
flexible - and the nice thing is that you can develop a site on a single 
mpm_worker instance and easily migrate over to the mpm_event/mpm_worker module.

It is nice to use the same configuration language on both sites...

mpm_event like all Apache mpm_s is much better at handling "issues" where nginx 
just goes F* and returns nothing. When we have issues we can detect them on 
apache mpms - but we often fail to see nginx errors as it sort of just dies!


-----Original Message-----
From: pengyh <pen...@mail.de> 
Sent: 09 August 2022 13:04
To: James Smith <j...@sanger.ac.uk>; modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: is mpm_event safe for modperl handler? [EXT]

I think running Ignix as front-end server and mod_perl for backend server is 
the more popular choice.



> If you want the speed of mod_event for static content and the power of 
> mod_perl for dynamic content - the best way is to run a lightweight mod_event 
> apache in front of a mod_prefork to run the mod_perl....



-- 
 The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research 
 Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a 
 company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered 
 office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.

Reply via email to