I guess my thought is that what you are doing is encouraging leaving this code out of the server. By leaving things the way they are, you can't work on the server unless it is exactly where it should be in the server. It also means that when/if it goes back into the server, no changes will be necessary.
Ryan On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: > Ryan, > > That would work too. :) > However, I'd like to keep the module name as-is. That way, we > don't get *too* comfortable, and stick to the idea of making this a > separately maintained module, which may one day be rolled back into > the stock daemon. Having something ugly but workable is encouragement > to fix it, IMO. > Call me crazy; I know you want to. :) > > Victor > -- > Victor J. Orlikowski > ====================== > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
