Ryan's got a point there, Victor. That's why I opted for the placeholder proxy 
doc page instead of wiring it totally out of the httpd manual.

OTOH, I was thinking that the real /build dir stuff would take care of building 
the "unaltered" proxy code (that you could just check out into the 
/modules/proxy dir) as though that's exactly what you had done, in case you 
wanted to build outside the httpd tree.

Or am I the one who's crazy? 8^)

Chuck

On Tuesday, February 20, 2001, at 04:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  
> I guess my thought is that what you are doing is encouraging leaving this 
> code out of the server.  By leaving things the way they are, you can't 
> work on the server unless it is exactly where it should be in the server. 
> It also means that when/if it goes back into the server, no changes will 
> be necessary. 
>  
> Ryan 
>  
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: 
>  
> > Ryan, 
> > 
> >     That would work too. :) 
> >     However, I'd like to keep the module name as-is. That way, we 
> > don't get *too* comfortable, and stick to the idea of making this a 
> > separately maintained module, which may one day be rolled back into 
> > the stock daemon. Having something ugly but workable is encouragement 
> > to fix it, IMO. 
> > Call me crazy; I know you want to. :) 
> > 
> > Victor 
> > -- 
> > Victor J. Orlikowski 
> > ====================== 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 
> > 
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
>  
> Ryan Bloom                            [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 406 29th St. 
> San Francisco, CA 94131 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  
>  
>  

Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/

Reply via email to