From: "Chuck Murcko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:45 PM
> On Monday, August 27, 2001, at 07:44 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > > > Chuck Murcko wrote: > > > >> Like mid air refueling, merging proxy back into httpd will work best > >> when both moving pieces are in sync; that's the tricky part. > > > > I think the best idea is to fold mod_proxy back into the httpd-2.0 tree > > as it is now, and allow the wider exposure to uncover any problems, > > which we will then just fix as we otherwise would anyway. > > > > I also think keeping a module-2.1 sandbox available for additional work > > is a good idea. There will be an httpd-2.1 at some point in the future, > > we can use this module-2.1 sandbox until the new development track > > happens. > > > > Definitely +1 for keeping the cvs module regardless. > > I think we're in good enough shape to merge httpd with the module-2.0 > code. We didn't promise a fully operational cache until 2.0+ and > nobody's been very upset by that yet. > > BillR, are you also thinking along the lines of cleaning out httpd core > eventually into separate repositories? No. https, perhaps, to accomodate multiple technical crypto issues. We are an http server first, that's not going to move :) Maybe a parallel repository for HTTP/1.2, but I don't see that problem ariving for a while. Bill
