Ian Holsman wrote: > just wondering what people's position is on this one. > > should we be masking error pages coming from the reverse proxy > with the 'standard' server responses from the main server. > > we really need to do something when we are using mod-include to include > a reverse proxied subcomponent. > at the moment it will show the 404 page from the r-proxy server. > if we try to include a normal file, we get the SSI error message > '[error]'. > > I'm proposing that proxy-http does the same thing, and mask the > errorpages returned from the appserver
MSIE has this behavior - and it's bogus. A replacement 404 page could
mask the real content that is returned that could be more useful.
I have seen some people ask for this behavior though and yes, in some
cases it can be useful - at best it should be possible to enable 404
replacement with a config directive, but it definitely shouldn't be the
default.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
