On Tuesday 25 September 2001 04:13 pm, Graham Leggett wrote: > Graham Leggett wrote: > > The return of mod_proxy to > > the main tree received the required +1's, and at this stage it seems the > > best way forward to get progress on getting proxy some much needed > > testing. > > Right now, what is the best way of returning mod_proxy to the tree? Is > it > > a) checking in the latest copy of proxy, relying on the old httpd-proxy > tree for history. > b) moving the ,v files across so that history is carried forward into > httpd-2.0 tree?
B. That history is incredibly important since proxy is basically a complete re-write for 2.0. Of course, Greg is likely to disagree with me (this is one of our long-standing disagreements), so wait for him to respond too, please. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
