> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Marmor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 3:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: httpd-2.0 nightly build log
>
>
> Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> > > However, isn't it a good opportunity to release a 2.0.31
> combination?
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean.
> > once the 2.0.31 is tagged and rolled the code shouldn't change,
> > so their is no real use of compiling it every day for the
> same result.
>
> Not an everyday (night?) build;
> Just an "every-rolling" build.
> Once a new alpha/beta/GA is released, a new build will be uploaded to
> the FTP.
>
the latest rolls are usually kept in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/
when their ready for general distribution.
do you think we need a historical archive of all the alphas ?
the alphas are not nescessarily good, in fact most of them don't make
it to beta for a good reason. (they segfault usually)
Also the tag isn't nescessarily static. the Release Manager can chop&
change what is in the tag before it is rolled.
> The snapshot is sometimes broken because of big patches that are in
> their middle in the CVS when the snapshot is checking out its files.
>
> (maybe the confusion is my fault: There is a directory which holds
> the latest snapshots of the CVS, and this was the issue of my
> suggestion. My suggestion had nothing to do with the LOG OF THE
> BUILD, but with those snapshots; Maybe I had to start a new thread,
> rather than responding to the "httpd-2.0 nightly build log". Sorry!)
>
> --
> Eli Marmor
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CTO, Founder
> Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
> __________________________________________________________
> Tel.: +972-9-766-1020 8 Yad-Harutzim St.
> Fax.: +972-9-766-1314 P.O.B. 7004
> Mobile: +972-50-23-7338 Kfar-Saba 44641, Israel
>
