On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Graham Leggett wrote: >Supporting HTTP/1.0 Keepalives was hard to do, and if my rusty memory >serves there were issues in HTTP/1.1 with HTTP/1.0 keepalives - thus I >didn't worry about keepalives in the HTTP/1.0 case. >Is the resultant non-keepalive load significantly high to cause a problem?
Load is not the problem. Client side latency is. We could tell the users to upgrade, though. Since IE has been HTTP/1.1 from 5.0 on it would effectively be relevant for Netscape 4.x users only.
