On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 12:14, Graham Leggett wrote: > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > I have no suggestion, but hasn't this already been done in 2.0? The > > only problem with doing this in 1.3, is that we are unlikely to have > > anymore 1.3 releases. We may be better off to just keep the patch on > > the site. > > AFAIK v2.0 doesn't (does it?) - I was going to commit to v2.0, and then > to v1.3 for completeness (even if there are no new versions of v1.3, at > least it's there). >
before you commit the change to 2.0 can you make sure that the existing behavior is still maintained/available, and if it can't be then you will need to make a new directive. also.. what about virtual hosts.. doesn't requiring them to have a hostname break them? > Regards, > Graham > -- > ----------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "There's a moon > over Bourbon Street > tonight..." -- Ian Holsman Performance Measurement & Analysis CNET Networks PH: 415-344-2608
