On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 09:30, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 13 Aug 2002, Geff wrote: > > > 1. mod_proxy is RFC compliant - So why break apache to > > accommodate M$'s lack of ability to read and implement a standard > > that was published in June 1999? > > IMO, removing Content-Length header from 304 responses will not change > alleged mod_proxy compliance. In fact, one could argue that removing > entity headers is the right thing to do for proxy implementations > trying to follow IETF cornerstone principle of "garbage in, compliance > out". >
But to your point of Garbage in -> compliance out. 10.3.5 says, "no entity headers in a 304 response." So it seems to make more sense to remove all or none. Geff
