Ian Holsman wrote: > > On 14/11/2003, at 7:38 AM, Cahya Wirawan wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:38:31PM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote: > >> I wrote: > >> > >>> ... > > > > two points. > where are you specifying *which* ip you want to bind to. > are you relying on the request coming in on the same ip# your request > should be going out on?
After his patch is working, the next step is to define a directive to control this behavior. This directive will define the IP (or hostname), and will have 2 special keywords, one for the default IP of the machine (i.e. "don't bind to anything"), and the second for the IP of the current vhost (i.e. what his patch is doing currently). The only decision that will remain after that, is what to define as the default value of this directive; If you ask me, I think that the IP of the vhost should be the default. It makes more sense than the default IP of the machine. -- Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO, Founder Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd. __________________________________________________________ Tel.: +972-9-766-1020 8 Yad-Harutzim St. Fax.: +972-9-766-1314 P.O.B. 7004 Mobile: +972-50-23-7338 Kfar-Saba 44641, Israel
