On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Francois-Rene Rideau wrote: > > I've reviewed this in the context of httpd-2.1, and it looks good to me > with essentially the same patch. It works on your testcase, and I'm > 99% satisfied that it doesn't break anything. Ready to commit if we +1 here too - we had something ourselfs which did this in a dirty/specific ase; and this patch makes that unessesary and is more general. Dw.
