On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Brett Beaumont wrote: > Thanks for the response Nick. Can you let me know > whether you believe this patch addresses our > particular problem (the loss of cookies set by the > reverse proxy server--not cookies set by the proxied > server) or whether you are suggesting we may need this > patch in addition to our changes?
I was merely suggesting it might be relevant. It wasn't clear to me whether your cookies were in fact (merely) a workaround for the problem described and fixed in that bug report, so I just pointed it out and left you to decide whether it's relevant to you. -- Nick Kew
