>In reality though mod and square are completely opposite terms.
Go tell it to Bruce Hornsby and the range, baby! I'd partly agree with
you Paul, but in most books, when done properly - i.e. not the dress
up late 60s hippy/mod/psyche crossover look but your bog
standard mod mod look, of course it looks square.
Mods - they're interesting on the inside.
>2) I thought Mark was being serious 'cause based on his posts he doesn't
>seem particularly bright.....
eh? He doesn't mention his education, no, and he might be just a
photographer,
but I can't remember anything he's said that seems stupid or unintelligent,
or
badly missing the point . . . on the other hand.
