Daniel Geddes wrote:

> > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 14:57:33 -0500
> > From: El Salvador Dali Lama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: "MOD" Question
> >
> > Daniel Geddes wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting question there Davy....Whatever happened to your "FuturaMods" list?
> > > I tried to join as a laugh, but after filling out all the required boxes (date of
> > > birth?)
> > > it seems I was not ALLOWED to join for whatever reason.  Go figure.  Well,
> > > obviously
> > > I'm crushed....but it is rather comical don't you think?  No dissenting voices
> > > allowed there,  but Goddammit the modslist better listen to ALL the tripe and
> > > more!
> > > So I'll quote Davy Love here:
> > >
> > > "How Mod is it to censor stuff...say like...uh...erm... an email list for
> > > "mods"?  Do you think that censorship stifles the growth of a scene?  Or
> > > do you think it makes it perfect...?"
> > >
> > > Seriously now...don't you have some big party to go to?
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > If you have concerns about the Futuramods list Dan you should direct them to:
> >
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://www.onelist.com/members/FuturaMods
> >
> > All questions concerning that list will be answered for you Dan... including the 
>fact that the
> > list is doing fine with 39 members signed up to date. It doesn't concern the 
>modslist or it's
> > members that is why in the questions I posed in my original post I did not mention 
>it.  Hard to
> > understand?  I asked a valid question and of course you did not answer it... even 
>after I
> > specifically requested serious answers only and not just wise ass comments from 
>the San
> > Francisco Mod squad.
> >
> > And yes I do have a big party to go to... thanks for reminding me,
> >
> > Davy
> >
>
> Funny how you didn't address any of my points there Davy...I DID go to your list to 
>check it out,
> and I explained what happened....So, let me get this straight ...we aren't even 
>allowed to MENTION
> the FuturaMods now?  But yet you can bitch all about the modslist here, while 
>recruiting for your
> own NEW list....and when those that you deem unacceptable for your new list mention 
>it here,
> you tell them not to bring it up (while condemning others for censorship...)  My 
>what a mixed
> bag of standards you have.  I thought my comments were rather straight forward and 
>based in fact.
> And hey, even "mod" based.
> Is it interesting yet folks?...I thought not.

Dan,

I didn't address anything because it is not relevant to this list at all.  If you want 
to take this off list
then fine.  Brian has warned both you and I about this before has he not...?  I'm not 
taking your bait... so
chill.

You must lead a sad life if you get this wound up by me?

Davy

Reply via email to