Leyla McNickle wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> I would have to agree. Travis ARE pants. But there
> are different levels of Pants...
> Travis are better than...Embrace. Which isn't saying
> much. Thats how I have always described
> Travis...better than Embrace. They have that one
> song... "Im so Happy, cos youre so happy..." which is
> quite equivelent to Embrace's "All you good good
> people..listen to me" Equally as stupid. But not as
> Pantsy. :) That made sense. And Travis are more
> attractive than Embrace...which makes them less pants?
> Who CAREs!
> They are both just as Pants as the Soup Dragons.
> Awful.
>
> BTW. Anyone heard of "The Dandys"? like them?
>
> i just had a big psychology exam...and my brain hurts.
> sorry for the incoherence.
> ahhhh....
> leyla
Well everyone has there own version of what they sound like or whether
or not they like Travis but to throw myself in to the lions here... I
will come right out and say that I really like them. Their show sold
out here in like 10 minutes. They have a lot more records out than just
that one (which isn't their strongest track) over played pop song you
mentioned above. U16 Girls is brilliant as is Tied To The 90's... they
have great lyrics and don't suck whatsoever in my opinion.
They are however... not "MOD" in the sense of sounding like a
soul/ska/psych/garage/60's band... not in the least. So if that's what
you want you should avoid this show at all costs...
Cheers,
Davy
______________________________________________
Faster, stronger and able to send millions
of emails in one click: the new Topica site!
http://www.topica.com/t/14