> I don't get your point at all.
The point is that I find it hard to take 'fuck mod, it's the music that
counts' criticism from someone who chooses a folk-rock nom-de-plume. Not
because there's anything wrong with folk rock, but because it says to me
that you're not interested (in the mod thing) on any other level than
60s music, and I strongly disagree that that's what it's about.
> And Unhalfbricking a 60s album...by a very young 60s psych-folk->rock
> band.
Who did a very nice version of Buckley's 'Morning Glory' on bootleg -
yes, I know, I thought I'd established I was knowledgable enough to play
spot the reference.
>at least half could be
>played in
> one of your discos while you show off your cool new moves
Good as it is musically, I really doubt it; you don't even know what
music is played at the clubs I go to. But you know, I do actually enjoy
going out, drinking and dancing (not as much as I used to when younger)
and talking to people with similar interests, rather than staying in
with the hi-fi. I do actually take an interest in clothing styles as
much as music. Perhaps I'm missing the point somewhere. . .
The vaguely rhytmic step side-to-side isn't a new move either.
____________________________________________________________
T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
