Ade Olonoh wrote: > > If you still think your modules will be useful on CPAN, then by all means upload >them. I just think that based on the examples of Map::Hash, etc. that you've shown >one may be able to get more use by applying some of the modules that are already on >CPAN or in the core. I typically won't use a CPAN module if I can replicate the >functionality it offers with one or two lines of code. The overhead in loading a >module, or even in learning the interface to another module just doesn't seem worth >it. But then that's just me. Unfortunately this list is so dead sometimes that it's >hard to get enough feedback to form a consensus.
I personally agree. Sometimes less as more. Especially as CPAN is growing very large, and there is not much of a rating/feedback system built into it, so it's sometimes hard to tell which of similar modules which actually be useful for the task at hand. -mark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mark Stosberg Principal Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Summersault, LLC 765-939-9301 ext 223 website development . . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . .
