On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 04:10 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:23:44PM -0500, Ken Y. Clark wrote: >> Since what I've got isn't really related to >> DBI[1], I figure it probably more belongs in SQL::. Also, SQL:: is >> less crowded, so I'm hoping my module wouldn't get lost in the >> shuffle. Specifically, I was thinking "SQL::Translator" for the >> package name, with all the rest of my modules (Parsers, Producers, >> etc.) living under there. > > Sounds good to me. Agreed, I think SQL::Translator is a decent name. A question, though - does this mean you've got some sort of dialect-independent representation of SQL queries? That's kind of interesting. Might it be possible to open that interface up, so that people could write some sort of neutral-SQL and send it to whatever database they feel like that day? -Ken
