> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Orton) writes:
> > I more meant that being the man with the Net::
>
> Oh, you still believe that namespace ownership actually
> exists in practice?
> How quaint.
>
> Maybe I shouldn't have uploaded my latest module into Tie::,
> because that's
> owned by...
Apparently by SCO, or so they claim.... ;-)
No, I wasnt meaning to imply he had some sort of right to the Net:: namespace, but he is responsible for the most commonly known Net:: modules, and presuambly would have considerable knowledge about who is interested in these things etc...
But anyway, I was just trying to be helpful, not trying to kick up a controversy.
Yves
