Jim Cromie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-01 00:04] wrote:
>> attached is 8k of module code (small enough to just send ?)

On Mon 01 Dec 2003, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please don't.

No, please do.  I wouldn't have bothered to look at it otherwise.

I agree with Simon that the name doesn't carry useful meaning.  Try to
pick something that people are likely to use as a search term.
Data::Dumper::Styled?  Data::Dumper::StyledOutput?
Data::Dumper::VariedOutput?  Actually all those ideas are either wrong
or ugly, but they might trigger a better idea in someone else's brain.

Kake

Reply via email to