[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Rolsky) writes:
> No, but it's not easier, and it's _much_ less flexible. 

The difference between you and I is that you see that as a bad thing and
I see it as a good thing. 

It's a philosophical difference when it comes down to it, such as between
Windows programming and Unix programming, or more like GNU Unix and BSD
Unix. I don't want to make a fuss, but if I did, I'd start talking about the
cat(1) Reference Manual. ;) 

Really, there's room for both kinds of module on CPAN, and there's room for
more than one philosophical viewpoint on CPAN too.

Didn't someone famous say something about there being more than one way
to do it?

-- 
The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what
you want.
                -- D. Cohen

Reply via email to