* Graciliano M. P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 06:16]: > First, I didn't know MIME::Lite until Orton send me an e-mail > in this list.
Of all the things that bother me in this discussion, this one bothers me the most. The reason for this, I think, is two-fold. Obviously Gracilliano's research for prior art was less than conclusive. I often get the impression that he's a little too enthusiastic about making new wheels. But I also find MIME::Lite to be a horrible name. It certainly doesn't present the module as a choice when you go through the obvious keywords looking for modules for sending mail. Of course, at this point, "MIME::Lite" is so well established a name a change is probably going to be more than difficult. I still think it's feasible though, so as the distribution under the new name includes a stub MIME/Lite.pm that just loads the name module. It's never too late to undo mistakes. (Assuming, of course, that people feel the way I do about the module's name.) -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
